Kemp’s “rural strike team” should be a step in the right direction. We’ll see.
First, props where they’re deserved. Georgia Governor Brian Kemp actually took a step in the right direction Monday when he told the AJC he’s creating a “rural strike team” to try to stimulate economic development in the state’s dying hinterlands. He reportedly plans to unveil the details in Swainsboro on Thursday.
Only time will tell whether this is anything more than eyewash and window dressing, but there were a couple of promising hints in the AJC’s story. One was that he’s bringing together “a half-dozen state departments and higher education agencies” to drive the effort. That implies a more strategic approach and focus than I’ve seen so far, and one that’s long overdue. Still, the strike force will have its work cut out for it.
The state of Georgia is quite literally in the process of tearing itself apart along rural and urban lines, and especially between Metro Atlanta and just about everything else from Macon south. These are not slow-moving trends. No matter how you come at it – economically, educationally, health-wise, politically – you can pretty much watch the division in real-time.
Take education as an example. In 1970, according to Census Bureau data, there were fewer than a quarter of a million college graduates in the entire state of Georgia, and slightly more than half of them lived outside Trouble in God’s Country’s 12-county Metro Atlanta region. Today, the state is home to nearly two million college graduates and 63 percent of them live in Metro Atlanta.
That disparity is only going to grow. Up until 2011, the 147 counties outside Metro Atlanta sent more freshmen to University System of Georgia (USG) institutions than the 12 Metro Atlanta counties, which is probably what you’d expect. But in 2011 Metro Atlanta overtook the rest of the state and ever since then it’s been sending significantly more freshmen to USG colleges and universities than the rest of the state combined (see graph at right).
At the state’s two flagship universities, the University of Georgia and Georgia Tech, the gulf is bigger yet. At Georgia Tech, 75.5 percent of the Fall 2018 in-state freshmen came from Metro Atlanta; at UGA, just over 63 percent of the in-state freshmen came from Metro Atlanta. By my count, 71 counties, all rural, didn’t send a single high school graduate to Tech in the fall of 2018; at UGA, the same was true of 22 counties.
These differences matter. Not only do they fuel Metro Atlanta’s outsized economic growth, they drive widening disparities in taxes paid and social services consumed. With just under half the state’s population, Metro Atlanta in 2016 coughed up nearly two-thirds of the state’s federal taxes while consuming, as examples, about 37 percent of the state’s Medicaid services and about 41 percent of its food stamp benefits.
You can do the math on the other side of that equation. Oh, okay, I’ll help: the 99 counties that constitute Trouble in God’s Country’s Middle and South Georgia regions don’t even come close to covering their own Medicaid and food stamp costs, let alone anything else. After a while these kinds of numbers get to be politically untenable.
Some years back, I presented a very early version of my Trouble in God’s Country research to a group made up primarily of legislators. One of those was House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Mickey Channell, who has since passed away. “What do you do about it?” he asked. I didn’t know then and still don’t, at least not entirely. But I’ve since given it a lot of thought and would offer the following as a running start at an answer:
- First, the multi-agency approach suggested by Kemp is the right idea — and critical. The state of Georgia arguably has one of the strongest and most sophisticated economic development infrastructures in the nation, but my sense is that its work has been largely siloed and not well integrated with other departments and agencies of state government. The state’s urban-rural divide and the deterioration in much of rural Georgia constitutes a truly strategic problem. It’s not an exaggeration to call it an all-hands-on-deck crisis. In addition to the departments of Economic Development and Community Affairs, the team will have to include high-level engagement from throughout the state’s education bureaucracies and, I’d argue, public health and human services.
- Start with a realistic evaluation of the state’s various rural areas and recognize that some are more viable than others. Some politicians like to say they want to run government like a business. In business, if you’re losing money year after year, sooner or later you call it quits. Under that theory, I can take the governor to 50 or so counties where he ought to turn out the lights and call it a day. We can’t do that, of course, but it ought to be possible to invest discretionary tax dollars and other public resources in areas that at least have a fighting chance of generating a return, in terms of new growth and economic prosperity. In other words, resist the normal political temptation to attack the worst problems first; instead, identify the regions that still have a pulse and see if they can be saved.
- Shore up the regional hub cities first. It’s not just Georgia’s purely rural areas that are in serious decline; a lot of the major regional cities – Macon, Columbus, Augusta, etc. – are suffering various types of distress, and they are vital to rural areas around them. As a practical matter, it may be too late to do much good for Albany and the rural counties between it and the Alabama line; that entire region of the state is bleeding population and shrinking economically to a degree that may put it beyond near-term salvation. Figuring out how to strengthen other major hubs in ways that will enable them to better support their rural neighbors should be pretty close to the top of the to-do list for Kemp’s strike force.
- Challenge the rural areas to compete for the state’s attention and dollars. Hopefully, one of the initiatives that will come out of Kemp’s effort will be a process by which multi-county regions or areas of the state can apply to the state for funding and technical support. It shouldn’t be entirely on Kemp’s strike force to show up in Enigma, Ga., and say, “We’re from state government and we’re here to help you.” Rural areas should be required to come forward with a rational vision, demonstrate that they have the leadership capacity to drive a major effort, and put serious skin in the game. There should be milestones in that process and a credible system for evaluating progress.
- Bite the political bullet and implement Medicaid Expansion. I should have listed this first but figured Republicans would stop reading right then and there. Refusing to take advantage of Medicaid Expansion was the major failure of Nathan Deal’s administration and Kemp shows little inclination to do any better. His attempt at a “waiver” approach (an all but transparent effort to deny Barack Obama any credit for the program) apparently can’t even pass muster in Donald Trump’s Washington. Meanwhile, rural hospitals continue to close and people continue to die, prematurely and unnecessarily. Even if Deal, Kemp & Co. are blind to the health benefits of Medicaid Expansion, you’d think they’d see the economic benefits of pumping billions of dollars into rural Georgia. Maybe all things Obamacare still constitute a third rail of politics for Georgia Republicans, but my hunch is that the radioactivity levels tied to Medicaid Expansion have diminished to a point that it could be a political winner for Kemp – a Nixon-to-China sort of moment.
Again, I don’t know whether Kemp’s ”rural strike force” will prove to be anything more than eyewash and window dressing, but it’s encouraging that he’s taking a stab at the problem. Hope springs eternal.
(c) Trouble in God’s Country 2019
Very insightful analysis; cited by the AJC; great data on the education trends. As someone who works in city planning in smaller communities around the state of Georgia, I can see these trends playing out just driving around. Many counties need to be consolidated and some municipalities need to close down. But many many others can be saved, though and are doing reasonably well such as Cordele, Moultrie, Valdosta, and Thomasville. Triage is the right approach — but it won’t happen.
Don, many thanks for your kind comment. Based on your experience in city planning with small communities, you sound like somebody I should be talking to. Would it be possible for us talk sometime soon? My best email address is email@example.com. Many thanks. Charlie Hayslett
Having worked in rural economic development for almost a decade, I agree that “rural areas should be required to come forward with a rational vision, demonstrate that they have the leadership capacity to drive a major effort, and put serious skin in the game. There should be milestones in that process and a credible system for evaluating progress.”
However, some rural communities don’t have leadership or visioning capacity. What UGA’s Archway Partnership (google it – good stuff) does to prepare rural communities to receive development is the answer. Even Chris Clark has called out the program or something like it as the answer.
What isn’t the answer is state marketing of “mega sites” these work in areas with strong workforce or cusp-of-growth areas (Pooler & Walton Co for example). Kia was a lightning strike that won’t happen again in rural GA.