Mapping the death of rural Georgia

By

About a decade ago, still fairly early in my TIGC noodling, I came across an article about declining birth rates in rural areas in some other part of the country. Gee, I wondered. What’s the situation in rural Georgia?

As it turned out, that was easy enough to figure out, thanks to an excellent public database operated by the Georgia Department of Public Health (DPH). Known as OASIS (an acronym for “Online Analytical Statistical Information System”), it’s a repository for a wealth of population health data, including the number of births and deaths for all 159 counties going back to 1994.

This was, as I recall, in late 2016 or early 2017. I downloaded all the county-level birth and death numbers from 1994 through 2015 (the latest data available at the time), dumped it all into Excel, and let the spreadsheet calculate the difference between births and deaths for each county and each year. That entire process probably took less than 10 minutes, 15 at the most.

The next step involved a bit of semi-manual data wrangling and took a few minutes longer. I wanted to know how many counties had reported more deaths than births for each year, but couldn’t figure out how to get Excel to do that in one swell foop and wound up having to do year-by-year counts. Even that wasn’t all that difficult, but at first I thought I had gone down a rabbit hole that would prove to be a waste of time.

In 1994, only 12 counties reported more deaths than births; in ’95, the number was 18; in ’96, it dropped down to 9 counties and then bounced back up to 14 in ’97. Not much news here, I remember thinking. I kept going, though, and so did the boring little yawner of a trend I had unearthed. Over the first 15 years of OASIS’s data, as the graph at right shows, the number of counties reporting more deaths than births hit 19 a couple of times but never got above that. But then, starting in 2010 (or maybe a year or two earlier, actually), something obviously happened.

The first time I can remember using this data was in an April 2017 presentation to the opening session of the Georgia House Rural Development Council, held down in Tifton. The latest data available on OASIS at that point was for 2015, and the number of counties reporting more deaths than births for that year was 60 — more than double the number from 2010 (and five times what it had been in 1994).

I used this data in my PowerPoint presentation and can remember getting a bit of a rise out of otherwise mostly bored House members; one went a bit bug-eyed and looked at me like I had put a gun to his head. Which, metaphorically, I sort of had.

But this situation has continued to deteriorate, and it’s arguable now that much of rural Georgia is literally dying. As the graph above shows, the number of counties reporting more deaths than births rose steadily from 2010 on before spiking in the Covid years of 2020, ’21 and ’22. In the last two years, the number has dropped to 92 and 94, back on its pre-Covid trajectory.

The graph above tells part of the story and is frightening enough. But map the data over time and you can’t help but get the sense that you’re witnessing the spread of some kind of socioeconomic cancer consuming more and more of the state.

The 1994 map at right shows the 12 counties that reported more deaths than births that year, and there’s not much all that troubling about it. With median ages in the mid-50s, the three mountain counties highlighted on the state’s northern border — Fannin, Union and Towns — were all in negative birth-to-death territory, but they have continued to grow steadily thanks to in-migration.

Ten years later, the number of counties reporting more births than deaths was only up to 15, but certain patterns that would soon become more significant were starting to take shape. Down in southwest Georgia — aka SOWEGA — Stewart County had joined Quitman and Clay, hard on the Alabama line, in reporting more deaths than births. And a bit to the northeast, Upson had joined Talbot in this unhappy club.

Over in east-central Georgia, Warren and Wilkes had joined Glascock and Taliaferro to form a growing subregion of impoverished rural counties that were upside down on births and deaths — as, a county or two to the south, was Johnson County.

By the mid-2010s, this particular socioeconomic cancer was approaching full bloom. When I made my aforementioned April 2017 presentation to the House Rural Development Council, with 2015 data, the number of counties reporting more deaths than births had quadrupled to 60, with two others at break-even — reporting exactly the same number of births and deaths.

More significantly, the regions only being hinted at in the 2004 map were pretty much fully formed — and still growing and metastasizing toward one another. Of the southwest Georgia counties on or near the Alabama line, only Early County was still producing more births than deaths. What’s more, a chain of impoverished upside-down counties was forming in interior Middle and South Georgia — and beginning to connect to the growing cluster of equally upside-down counties in east-central Georgia.

This was basically a part of the state that the late George Berry, who served as commissioner of the Department of Industry, Trade & Tourism (now Economic Development) under Governor Joe Frank Harris, once described to me as a “crescent of poverty” whose problems he found unsolvable. Berry held that position through most of the 1980s, and things have only gotten worse since then.

Indeed, the number of counties reporting more deaths than births has continued to climb since my presentation to the HRDC. By 2019, the number was up to 78 — and then exploded when Covid hit.

The peak came in 2021 when 124 of the state’s 159 counties found themselves under water, with more burials than births. As this map shows, this particularly unhappy condition had with, with few exceptions, covered nearly all of rural Middle and South Georgia, crept up the state’s eastern border with South Carolina, and all the way across its northern border with North Carolina and Tennessee.

Outside Metro Atlanta, only a handful of counties and regions dodged a direct hit from this public health hurricane.

As Covid largely passed after 2022, this trend seems to have settled back into its pre-Covid trajectory. As the graph above shows, it dropped to 92 in 2023 and 94 in 2024 (map at right). But that’s not exactly good news. By my math, that’s about where it would have been without Covid.

The good news, of a sort, is that this situation can’t get a whole lot worse — at least in terms of the number of counties with more deaths than births each year. Metro Atlanta’s growth serves as a buffer against the trend north of the gnat line, and several important economic assets — Georgia Southern University in Statesboro, the new Hyundai plant in Bryan County, and the Savannah ports — seem to be holding off the grim reaper in southeast and coastal Georgia.

But for much of interior rural Georgia, this cancer seems terminal.

Back up in the top half of the story, I noted that “something” had happened around 2010 but never got around to explaining what. I’m working now on a post that will take a stab at that.

Copyright Trouble in God’s Country 2025

Comments

  1. PAMELA S WOODLEY

    Very interesting (and concerning) analysis. Thank you

    1. Anne Mursch

      I have to wonder if red state governors including Kemp refusing to expand Medicaid to rural GA has had negative health outcomes.. This decision also caused rural hospitals to close due too the lack of Medicaid income.

      1. Jessie Bruno

        I think it’s certainly a piece of the cause. Access to healthcare is factor in economic development. I would add that we should be paying attention to doctors and OBGYNs leaving the state after the state passed the heartbeat bill. I don’t know if it’s a trend or just anecdotal. But for rural residents, it’s scary enough to have a child here now, scarier if there’s no maternal or infant healthcare within 30 minutes.

  2. Doug Monroe

    Good Lord, Charlie! This is absolutely horrifying. I wonder if any of the gubernatorial candidates will mention the death of these counties. Great work.

  3. Dennis King

    Shocking. I am saddened about the outlook for the future for the counties. Does anyone care?

    1. Kerry T. Hixon

      Apparently no one who could make a difference does.

  4. Carlotta Ungaro

    Can you update the last map with county names?:They all say Georgia.

    Thanks!

    1. Charles Hayslett

      Done, and thanks.

  5. Rick Doner

    This is very valuable. It would be useful if combined with other public health data and layered on with racial and partisan shifts. Please keep up this good work.

  6. Bryn Bailey

    Could this have anything to do with the death of rural HOSPITALS. We no longer deliver babies at our hospital but everyone tries to come back before they die

  7. John F. Eden IV

    Trying again… This is fascinating and disturbing! I’m interested to hear the why. Also wonder if this is primarily increased deaths or reduced births — or a mix of both. It would also be interesting to see this data paired with economic data, as you hinted at.

  8. Carlotta Ungaro

    I think it is more about economic opportunity. Factories started shutting down in the 80s and then that accelerated in the late 90s. Many young people leave for greener pastures. I’m one of those that did that.

  9. Robert Coram

    Charlie:
    I grew up in Edison, a town of about 1,000 in Calhoun County. Deep in the heart of SOWEGA. Since the mid-1950s Edison has lost two doctors, a 10-bed hospital, a John Deere dealership, a Chevrolet dealership, two restaurants, a drug store, two hardware stores, a department store, a newspaper, a movie theater, a meat market, and two grocery stores.
    What is left? An empty shell. If a person’s birthplace is his destiny, who would want to bring a child into this waste land? I haven’t returned to my hometown in almost ten years. Why? I don’t have a hometown.
    Robert Coram

    1. David

      Hi Robert. I just posted below about the dilemma facing rural counties, and Edison is the perfect example. I had never heard of Edison, GA, and it looks like it was once a charming little town. But if you take a Google Maps tour down the main street, you won’t see a single person on the sidewalks downtown despite it being the middle of the day. And if you zoom out and look at the areas surrounding the town, it is entirely farmland as far as I can tell. As those farms automate (which they have to do to be profitable), then fewer and fewer people are earning wages which means there are fewer and fewer people to support the car dealerships, the restaurants, the drug stores, etc. A small town that is 100% dependent on the surrounding land as its engine for wealth creation is structurally doomed.

  10. David

    This is not just a Georgia issue, its a national one. I would argue that the fundamental challenge for rural America is that its primary economic asset is land. The problem with land is that it is fixed (we ain’t adding anymore), and yet for real wealth to be created, that land has to be more productive each year. That generally means either increasing its yield (through better crop management or resource extraction) and/or reducing the number of people it takes to produce that yield (by automating). By automating, you reduce the number of jobs available, which means you reduce the amount of economic activity in the area, which means young people leave, schools empty out and stores close.

    Jane Jacobs once wrote that “rural economic development is a contradiction in terms”. What she meant was that the only way for rural areas to grow is for them to urbanize. You need to find productive assets other than land to propel growth. That’s why small, rural towns with universities, hospitals and military bases can thrive because they are not solely dependent on land as their engine for wealth creation. Big industrial facilities can also play that role, although they are more vulnerable to economic changes, and we have seen what happens when a town is almost fully dependent on a private employer: if they go belly up, so does the town. If I were advising the Georgia General Assembly, I would recommend that their rural economic development efforts be focused on “city-building”, investing in the towns or small cities that are scattered around that have a diverse set of non-land based assets that can be leveraged to attract private investment, residents and young people. For those counties that don’t have that type of opportunity, I don’t think there is really anything to be done.

  11. T Adams

    Is this just a ‘red state’ phenomenon, or is it nationwide? The reason I ask is that I was involved in a conversation with a number of people about where they would like to move, and/or retire to, and many (most) said ‘No red states’.

    I get it at some level, as I grew up in a ‘red state’, and was exposed to the ‘joys’ of living there. A red state that has gotten a lot worse in the past 10 years or so.

    So I wonder: is it nationwide, state by state, etc.

    How can people get that kind of data and make their own discoveries?

    1. Carlotta

      Its a rural thing. You will see similar problems in blue states in the rural areas.

    2. Charles Hayslett

      Rural decline is a global problem. I’ve focused on Georgia because that’s where I am and the state I know best, but I’ve also spent some time studying other U.S. states for comparative purposes. I’m comfortable saying that the socioeconomic problems are worse in the Deep South than other parts of the country and that Georgia’s problems are extreme but not unique.

      Nearly all the data sources I use are available online. In a few cases I’ve had to file open records requests with the state government.

  12. Interested Reader

    I would put my money on the financial crisis of 2008 which led to this acceleration. I would love to see this analysis for every state as most states need to know what this looks like for them.

    1. Carlotta

      This started long before 2008. NAFTA really hurt.

  13. Nicholas

    There is the baby boomer factor and the boredom factor to consider as well. Old people drying off and young people wanting anything but farm life. Are the cities growing?

  14. Friday, August 22, 2025 – The Georgia Flyover

    […] ➤ Statewide: A researcher says rural Georgia faces a population crisis, with 94 counties reporting more deaths than births in 2024, continuing a trend since 2010. (More) […]

  15. Laurie

    I live in White County (Cleveland, Helen, & Sautee, Ga). We don’t have a hospital. If a pregnant woman delivers her child in a Hall County (Gainesville) hospital, but brings baby home to White County, where is that birth recorded? We do have several funeral homes. I assume they do a majority of the “death” reporting?

    1. Charles Hayslett

      Births and deaths are booked to the county of residence. If a White County woman delivers her baby at Northeast Georgia Health in Gainesville, that both is recorded as a White County birth. Ditto deaths. If a White County man is, for example, rushed to Gainesville after having had a heart attack and dies at the hospital there, it’s still booked as a White County death.

  16. Miller Rollins

    My guess would be that during the years of the Great Recession, which carried on for longer in rural areas, people, especially those in poverty, figured out that they might not be able to afford bringing a child into the world. Just a thought. Thanks for your work.

  17. JMG

    This is exactly why my parents stressed education beyond HS for me. I had to leave rural living if I wanted to end the generational financial struggles that plagued my family. I’m Savannah born but I graduated HS from one of the lowest performing HS’s in the state – Burke Co. Our entire school system got free breakfast & lunch when I was there in the 90s. I left for college in Milledgeville then Athens where I finished in 2000 & moved to ATL to begin a corp job. Metro ATL has been incredibly good to me & I’ve raised 3 children here. Zero regrets!! Completely changed the trajectory of my life for the better. My parents moved to Henry Co south of the city (I’m in Gwinnett) in the early 2000s so they could be closer to grandkids. I have family in Pulaski Co – that area seems to be doing decent maybe due to proximity to Macon, I’m not really sure as I don’t enjoy going that far south. My son moved to college in Brunswick last summer & moved back after his first year. His experience was not good; he complained about lack of every convenience he grew up with haha. But mostly he noticed the poverty & how stuck people are down there working dead end jobs for very little pay. It was quite eye opening for him. I do think many people from metro ATL retire in or relocate to more rural areas but not really further than 90 mins away from the city. For instance my cousin, a childless millennial, has 2 homes in the city & moved to Lake Oconee w/ the option to go back and forth; works remotely as many do now. My children all say they do not plan to have kids; all of their friends are saying the same thing. It’s simply not affordable & they already know it. Most of them plan to also have remote jobs so they can enjoy travel, and keep a home base at their parents’ house near metro ATL to save on costs. I see that as a growing trend. It’s truly sad that rural counties are losing more people than gaining. From what I’ve seen, only the wealthy families w/ successful businesses in those counties will hold onto their land and if they are tight knit w/ their adult children, they will live close by. I know someone in Clay Co who is struggling to care for his grandparents’ & parents’ aging homes + an aging parent. His son moved to Alabama for a better work opportunity & does not wish to move back there. The very large farm in that area owns the bulk of the land there and surrounding town. Not sure what will happen if the workforce begins leaving for better paying jobs further away.

  18. Laurie Ott

    Thank you for collecting and analyzing this data. Many rural Georgia counties report no in-county births because local hospitals have closed or stopped delivering babies, so births are recorded in neighboring counties with active facilities. The Georgia Higher Education Healthcare Initiative would be interested in comparing birth trends with census population data (ages 0-5 vs. 65+) to better understand community needs, and we’d love to collaborate and share data. Let me know if you are interesting in highlighting how regional differences and health provider shortages uniquely affect rural maternal and child health. Laurie Ott (Georgia Higher Education Healthcare Initiative http://www.gahehi.org)

  19. Thomas Woodbery

    Fascinating research and engaging comments by readers. It seems to be a real problem. There may be no simple solution and the trend may be unalterable. But your shining a light on the trend is valuable. Thank you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts